As mentioned last week, the British royalty is not the only royalty around. And, looking in another direction, in addition to royalty, there is also aristocracy. That, to an extent, is “later editions” of royalty, Prince Harry being the current top example, but there’s other stuff mixed in there too, be it simple “royalty” or the likes of Emperors.
From aristocracy on up, there’s wealth implied and things wealthy people can afford that “ordinary folks” can’t afford. There are also obligations of sorts. Regardless of the source of the wealth, chances are it includes a large house that has space for the likes of offices, nice guest rooms for important visitors, servants’ quarters and family life.
If for no other reason, then because of the generally unspecified “obligations,” it’s not unexpected to have the likes of the media following high class people around, reporting on both any fulfilling of social obligations and any “bad” (irresponsibility) being done by such individuals. (It’s not surprising that they chased after Princess Diana.)
One big thing these days, of course, is that a remotely possible heir to the British throne has a “black” American mother-in-law. It’s a good bet there will be intense curiosity over every child conceived down that line in regard to exactly how “black” (dark skinned, etc.) the kid will be until he/she is born and seen. (More maybe next week.)
Some things never change. 🙂
Filed under: Current Events, Europe, Musings | Leave a comment »